Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
Grasim Industries Ltd offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company says it engages “through industry associations” and that a dedicated internal team oversees these activities within a governance framework, but it does not explain whether this takes the form of letters, formal consultations, meetings, or other specific channels, nor does it name the governmental bodies it approaches. It references broad areas such as decarbonisation, Net-Zero emissions and alignment with the Paris goals, yet it does not identify any concrete laws, regulations or bills it has tried to influence. Likewise, the company expresses general support for climate action without describing the precise policy changes or quantitative outcomes it is pursuing. This high-level narrative demonstrates that some lobbying occurs, but the absence of identifiable policies, explicit targets or detailed mechanisms leaves only a partial picture of its activities.
|
1
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Moderate |
Grasim Industries Ltd indicates that it "has established a robust management framework to oversee both our involvement in climate advocacy and our engagements as members of trade associations" and confirms it has a "public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." The company notes that it is "an active member of several trade associations, leveraging its membership to improve sustainability throughout its value chain," and assigns oversight such that "all the Business Heads are responsible for implementing the policy at their respective sites." These disclosures show a structured approach to aligning indirect lobbying with its climate targets, but Grasim Industries does not disclose any mechanism for monitoring or managing direct lobbying efforts, does not identify a board-level committee or a single executive in charge of lobbying alignment, and provides no evidence of a periodic review or audit process for its climate advocacy activities.
|
2
|