Krung Thai Bank PCL

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None Krungthai Bank PCL emphasizes its commitment to climate governance by stating “we have an important role to play in driving Thailand transition towards a low carbon economy” and by describing that “the existing organizational structure allows our business activities to be conducted in accordance with the highest environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards and meet UN sustainable development goals (SDG).” It delineates how “Each governance level has specific function but works collaboratively for the best interest of the bank to provide climate resilience,” outlining the roles of the Board of Directors, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, Management Committee, and Sustainability Management Committee in setting strategy, overseeing policies, and monitoring climate risks and performance. However, we found no evidence of any policies, processes, or oversight mechanisms specifically governing the bank’s direct or indirect lobbying or policy advocacy activities.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Krung Thai Bank provides only limited visibility into its climate-related lobbying. It names a single, identifiable policy engagement—the development of the Thailand Sustainable Finance Taxonomy with the Bank of Thailand—and offers a brief description of that taxonomy’s scope in the energy and transport sectors. The disclosure identifies its target interlocutor (the Bank of Thailand), yet gives no information about how the bank actually sought to influence the process, such as specific meetings, submissions, or coalition work. The bank simply states its support for the taxonomy and notes its alignment with the Paris Agreement, but it does not spell out any concrete changes, amendments, or thresholds it is advocating. Because it reveals just one policy interaction, provides only a high-level reference to its engagement method, and lacks detail on the specific outcomes it is pursuing, the overall transparency of its climate lobbying remains limited.

D