Perenti Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Perenti Ltd provides only minimal insight into how it governs its external policy engagement. The company states that "Our participation in these organisations provides Perenti with a means to share and learn with our peers as well as to influence sustainability related policies and practices of the industry" and clarifies that such engagement is carried out "consistent with the Perenti Code of Conduct," which indicates some intention to align indirect influencing activities with internal standards. It also notes that "sustainability related issues are discussed collectively by the Board" and that an annual enterprise-wide risk review is conducted with the Group Executive and Board, but there is no explicit description of a process, criteria, or dedicated oversight role specifically focused on monitoring or managing lobbying positions, nor any disclosure of how direct lobbying is governed or how the company assesses the alignment of trade-association positions with its own climate strategy. Consequently, while the company makes a passing reference to aligning participation in external organisations with its Code, it does not disclose any structured governance mechanism, named accountability body, or regular review dedicated to lobbying activities.

View Sources

1
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Perenti Ltd provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company indicates that it will "proactively engage with governments, peers, and others to support the development of effective climate change policies,” signalling that it does take part in climate policy discussions, but it does not name any specific laws, regulations, or jurisdictions it has addressed. Beyond this broad statement, the company gives no information about how it carries out its engagement: it does not clarify whether it writes letters, meets officials, submits consultation responses, or works through trade associations, nor does it identify the particular governmental bodies or policymakers it contacts. Likewise, the company offers only a general aspiration to back “effective climate change policies” and does not spell out the concrete policy changes or legislative outcomes it is seeking. This lack of specificity on the policy topics, the methods of engagement, and the objectives leaves significant gaps in transparency around its lobbying activity.

1