Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
ENAV provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company identifies one concrete policy arena—the SESAR 3 Joint Undertaking linked to the EU Single European Sky programme—and states that it “supports [the initiative] with no exceptions,” but it does not reveal engagement with any other specific climate regulations or confirm that this is the full extent of its lobbying. It explains one mechanism for influence—participation in the SESAR 3 public-private partnership—while naming the principal targets of that engagement, the European Commission and EUROCONTROL; however, no additional methods or audiences are described. Finally, ENAV outlines the general outcome it seeks, namely the acceleration of “innovative technological and operational solutions” for a low-carbon, digitally integrated European sky in line with the Paris Agreement, yet it stops short of articulating concrete legislative changes or measurable policy objectives. Taken together, the disclosures show some transparency but leave significant gaps about the breadth of policies, the range of tactics used, and the precise policy results the company hopes to achieve.
|
1
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Limited |
ENAV states that it seeks to keep its external policy engagement consistent with its climate goals but provides only limited insight into how this is governed. The company affirms it has “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and explains that it participates in European and international aviation bodies whose initiatives have “a particular focus on the environment issues and climate change related aspect.” It also notes that “ENAV can include in its organization all the outcomes from these engagements that in most cases are directly driven by ENAV,” indicating an intention to integrate the results of its advocacy into internal decision-making. However, the disclosure does not clarify any concrete monitoring or review mechanism, name any individual or board committee that oversees alignment, or describe how the company assesses or manages the climate-policy positions of the industry bodies with which it is involved. As such, while there is an explicit commitment to align engagement with the Paris goals, we found no evidence of a structured governance framework, dedicated oversight, or systematic assessment procedures for either direct or indirect lobbying activities.
|
1
|