Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd provides limited transparency around its climate lobbying. The company names specific policy areas like the EU Deforestation Regulations, the ACCUs system, and the forthcoming Nature Repair Market legislation but does not identify the precise legislative instruments or jurisdictional details. It states, “A review into the system around Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) was conducted by the government, with adjustments made that we hope will help accelerate our ability to generate ACCUs,” and that “New legislation will establish the Nature Repair Market, which will allow land managers to sell certificates earned through biodiversity projects.” AACo’s descriptions of its engagement mechanisms are broad and lack clarity on policymakers or targeted communications: aside from noting that “In FY23 we provided a written response to the Australian Government’s Consultation on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures,” it does not specify which departments or officials it addressed or other methods used. Similarly, while the company outlines its desired outcomes—such as aiming to “fast track the development of Asparagopsis as a feed additive for commercial application to the reduction of methane emissions” and to “develop an industry leading method for measuring, managing and forecasting soil carbon sequestration by satellite”—none of these include clear policy amendments, measurable targets, or specified changes to existing regulations. Overall, AACo’s disclosures identify the general areas of its policy engagement but provide limited detail on the specific lobbying methods or the precise policy outcomes sought.
|
D
|