Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Comprehensive |
Uber Technologies Inc has demonstrated a comprehensive level of transparency in its climate lobbying disclosures. While some descriptions initially used broad language such as "working hand in hand with policymakers, companies and climate leaders," later disclosures offer clear, detailed examples of its lobbying approach. The company outlines specific mechanisms by, for example, committing $1 million to support congestion pricing in New York—explaining, "We've already been advocating for this in New York. For years, we've been calling on the state legislature to pass a comprehensive congestion pricing plan…"—and by partnering with concrete entities including the Sacramento Regional Transit District and SharedStreets. In terms of policy focus, Uber has clearly identified specific climate targets by explicitly referring to measures like "urban access privileges for ZEVs and shared modes," "road, emissions, and congestion charges," as well as "binding ZEV mandates and internal combustion engine phaseouts." Furthermore, its clear articulation of desired outcomes is exemplified when it states, "The funding generated would directly support mass transit, a critical goal of our overall campaign," showing an intention to achieve measurable policy impacts. Together, these detailed disclosures across lobbying mechanisms, targeted policy areas, and specific outcomes sought reflect a robust and comprehensive approach to transparency.
|
4
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Strong |
Uber demonstrates a strong governance process for climate lobbying alignment, particularly through its detailed oversight structures and monitoring mechanisms. The company explicitly mentions that its "Government Affairs Committee, the company's internal governance structure comprising senior policy and business leaders in the United States," oversees political contributions and lobbying activities, ensuring alignment with Uber's values and priorities. This committee evaluates contributions based on factors such as "demonstration of political leadership, representation of the communities Uber serves, voting record, committee assignments, and support for policies and initiatives of importance to Uber." Furthermore, Uber's Board of Directors, through its "Nominating and Governance Committee," periodically reviews reports on corporate political activities and lobbying efforts, providing an additional layer of oversight. The Senior Vice President of Marketing and Public Affairs also plays a key role in overseeing political and lobbying activities, ensuring compliance with Uber's policies and applicable laws. Uber addresses indirect lobbying through trade associations, stating that it "monitors the use of dues or payments to trade associations and other organizations to ensure consistency with the company's values and long-term interests." The company conducts "annual reviews of payments to such associations and organizations as part of our assessment of the overall efficacy of our membership and support." In cases of significant misalignment, Uber may "consider pausing membership or terminating the relationship," as illustrated by its commitment to prioritize its "stated values and business objectives" over conflicting positions from trade associations. While Uber provides transparency by disclosing its lobbying expenses and activities semiannually and quarterly, the evidence does not indicate the publication of a comprehensive lobbying audit or detailed study of alignment across trade associations. Nonetheless, the governance structures and monitoring processes described indicate a robust approach to ensuring alignment of climate lobbying activities with the company's values and climate goals.
|
3
|