Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong | SKF AB provides a strong level of transparency on its climate-related lobbying. It names specific measures it has engaged on, including the EU’s “Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism” and a “UK Government support scheme for renewable tidal energy,” and states that it has argued for “regulations that create incentives that promote circular use,” giving readers a clear sense of the policy areas it seeks to influence. The company also describes multiple, well-defined lobbying channels and the decision-makers it approaches: it held “direct discussions between EU staff developing this legislation and SKF’s International Trade department in Brussels,” attended “pre-meetings with ICC and the chief negotiator for the Swedish delegation” at COP 26, met “UK ministers” through a trade organisation to press for renewable-energy funding, and took part in SteelZero “closed sessions with business and government representatives” in South Korea and India, among others. Finally, SKF is explicit about the outcomes it wants, such as having “the cost of CO2e … internalized,” creating “a global standard and definition on what low-emission and net-zero steel is,” ensuring public-sector purchasing of low-carbon steel, and securing “financial support to renewable energy,” all of which it says are “aligned with the Paris Agreement” and the 1.5 °C goal. Together, these disclosures demonstrate clear positions, mechanisms and objectives for the company’s climate-policy advocacy. | 3 |