Cury Construtora e Incorporadora SA

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Cury Construtora e Incorporadora SA provides only a modest level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying. It does identify a concrete piece of legislation—“Lei nº 12.187, de 29 de dezembro de 2009,” which created the national system for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions (Sinare)—showing that the company has at least one clearly disclosed focus for its engagement. The firm states it “supports the policy with no exceptions” and explains that this stance is aligned with the Paris Agreement, signalling a specific desired outcome: the full implementation of Sinare. However, beyond the general reference that the company “estabelece em suas diretrizes meios de mensuração de mitigação de emissões, corroborando com a política governamental instituída,” it does not spell out what lobbying mechanisms it employed (such as meetings, submissions, or coalition work) or which government bodies or officials it targeted. Because of this omission, stakeholders cannot see how the company sought to influence the legislation or whether it used direct or indirect channels. Overall, the disclosure names one policy and gives a clear position on it, but the absence of detail on methods and targets keeps the transparency level limited. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Cury Construtora e Incorporadora SA states that it is "sempre presente na liderança das associações participando efetivamente das decisões […] incluindo aqueles relacionados às mudanças climáticas", claiming that its active role in trade-association leadership enables it to "promover a transformação setorial e engajar outras empresas"; this indicates an intention to align indirect lobbying with its broader climate-change strategy. However, the company does not disclose a formal governance structure, any named individual or board committee responsible for supervising lobbying, nor does it describe concrete procedures (such as periodic reviews, alignment criteria, escalation steps, or withdrawal mechanisms) to monitor and manage either its direct or indirect policy engagement. Consequently, while there is some acknowledgement of the need for alignment, the underlying governance mechanisms, oversight and monitoring processes are not detailed, leaving limited transparency into how the company actually ensures its climate-related lobbying is consistent with its stated strategy. 1