Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited | Bloom Energy provides only limited visibility into its climate-policy lobbying. It notes that its policy, legal and regulatory teams are “focused heavily on direct policy engagement on local, state, and federal levels” and that representatives held “long and meaningful conversations” with “Governors of several U.S. states,” “Ministers of countries,” and the “White House National Climate Advisor,” indicating some direct contact with identifiable public officials, yet it gives no detail on the concrete tools used—such as written submissions, testimony, or formal consultations—nor does it list the specific jurisdictions or offices approached. The company discusses policy areas it cares about, citing broad support for the Inflation Reduction Act, the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act, and provisions such as the hydrogen production tax credit and incentives for microgrids and biogas equipment, but it does not clarify whether it actively lobbied on these statutes or any other named bills. Similarly, its desired outcomes are expressed only in general terms—scaling renewable hydrogen, promoting fuel cells, and “helping to decarbonize natural gas infrastructure”—without stating concrete legislative changes, amendments, or targets it seeks. Participation in multi-stakeholder bodies like the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Industry Association and the Hydrogen Council is mentioned, but the purpose and content of this indirect advocacy are not explained. As a result, the disclosure signals that some engagement occurs but offers little specific information on the policies pursued, the mechanisms employed, or the precise results the company is seeking. | 1 |