Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
CapitaLand Investment Ltd prioritises sustainability governance across its board and committees but discloses no governance process for its lobbying activities. For example, “the CLI Board considers sustainability issues as part of its strategic formulation, confirms the material ESG factors and oversees the management and monitoring of the material ESG factors,” and “CLI’s decarbonisation plan was developed as part of its 2030 Sustainability Master Plan (SMP),” demonstrating robust climate oversight; however, we found no evidence of any policy, committee or named individual responsible for monitoring or aligning direct or indirect lobbying, no reference to a lobbying review process, or exit/engagement criteria for trade associations, indicating an absence of disclosed lobbying governance.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
CapitaLand Investment offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company notes that it engages regulators such as the Singapore Exchange Regulation and the Monetary Authority of Singapore and participates in forums like the Building and Construction Authority Board, the REIT Association of Singapore Sustainability Taskforce and the Urban Land Institute Sustainability Council, demonstrating that it targets recognised policymaking bodies, yet it does not explain whether this occurs through letters, formal consultations, meetings or other channels. Its disclosures indicate broad involvement in policy areas that support the Singapore Green Plan and climate-related disclosure rules, but they stop short of naming any specific laws, regulations or amendments it has sought to influence. Likewise, the company refers generally to “promoting sustainability” without spelling out concrete legislative changes or measurable positions it is advocating. As a result, stakeholders are told that CapitaLand Investment participates in policy dialogues, but the precise policies, methods and outcomes of that engagement remain largely undefined.
|
D
|