Louisiana-Pacific Corp – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	Louisiana-Pacific Corp indicates a moderate level of governance for its lobbying activities, with some formal policies guiding both direct and indirect engagement but lacking clear oversight or detailed monitoring mechanisms. It states that “we work to ensure that our direct and indirect activities that influence policy are aligned with our climate change strategy,” and notes that its approach is “guided by our commitment to address climate change and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which outlines our expectations around political engagement and activity,” demonstrating a policy framework that applies to both direct advocacy and trade-association involvement. The company highlights participation in “various trade associations through membership, leadership positions, and participation in committees,” suggesting attention to indirect lobbying. However, we found no evidence of a specific individual or formal body responsible for overseeing or reviewing these processes, no sign-off or review procedures are described, and the company explicitly confirms it has “No, and we do not plan to have [a public position statement aligned with the Paris Agreement] in the next two years.” View Sources	C

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Moderate

Louisiana-Pacific Corp indicates a moderate level of governance for its lobbying activities, with some formal policies guiding both direct and indirect engagement but lacking clear oversight or detailed monitoring mechanisms. It states that “we work to ensure that our direct and indirect activities that influence policy are aligned with our climate change strategy,” and notes that its approach is “guided by our commitment to address climate change and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which outlines our expectations around political engagement and activity,” demonstrating a policy framework that applies to both direct advocacy and trade-association involvement. The company highlights participation in “various trade associations through membership, leadership positions, and participation in committees,” suggesting attention to indirect lobbying. However, we found no evidence of a specific individual or formal body responsible for overseeing or reviewing these processes, no sign-off or review procedures are described, and the company explicitly confirms it has “No, and we do not plan to have [a public position statement aligned with the Paris Agreement] in the next two years.”

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	No evidence found	E