Tung Ho Steel Enterprise Corp

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Strong	Tung Ho Steel Enterprise Corp demonstrates strong transparency around its climate lobbying activities. It clearly identifies the specific laws it engages on, including Taiwan’s Climate Change Response Act and the Renewable Energy Development Act, and ties its efforts to the national net-zero by 2050 pathway and the government’s nationally determined contribution. The company describes multiple detailed lobbying mechanisms—participating in public hearings on legislative amendments, holding consultations and seminars with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Legislative Yuan, and joining initiatives such as the Carbon Neutrality Alliance and the Global Steel Climate Council. Furthermore, it specifies the outcomes it seeks, including installing solar power to fulfill renewable energy requirements, cutting carbon emissions by 30% by 2030 compared with 2005 levels, achieving at least 30% renewables in its electricity use by 2030, and advocating for carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies to reach net-zero by 2050.	3

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	Tung Ho Steel Enterprise Corp expresses a basic commitment to align its policy engagement with climate goals, noting “Yes” to having a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” and highlighting that “THS has joined Carbon Neutral Alliance which is initiated by Chinese National Federation of Industries.” However, the company does not disclose any defined process for governing its direct or indirect lobbying activities, does not identify any individual or formal body tasked with overseeing or reviewing lobbying alignment, and provides no criteria for assessing its participation in external associations or for monitoring its advocacy in line with its climate strategy. We found no evidence of specific oversight, sign-off, or periodic review related to the company’s lobbying or policy advocacy.	1