Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Sankyo Tateyama discloses that its external policy engagement is channeled through the Japan Aluminium Association, noting that the association “気候変動問題の解決に積極的に関与しています” and has adopted a long-term climate vision to 2050, while the company itself “当協会の方針に賛同し、循環アルミの使用量増量を重要課題に位置づけて” and carries out related research and material-recycling initiatives. This shows the company is at least aware of the need to align its indirect lobbying with its climate objectives and states that it supports an industry body whose agenda is compatible with those objectives, which indicates some attention to alignment. However, the disclosure does not explain how the company internally monitors, reviews, or approves its lobbying positions, makes no reference to a recurring assessment of alignment, and does not identify any individual, board committee or other body responsible for overseeing external advocacy. In short, while the narrative confirms that Sankyo Tateyama seeks consistency between its climate commitments and its trade-association engagement, we found no published detail on oversight structures, accountability mechanisms, or a formal process for managing either direct or indirect climate lobbying activities.
View Sources
|
D |