Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| None |
No evidence found
|
0
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Moderate |
Cargotec provides some insight into how it governs climate-related public-policy engagement, stating that “all direct or indirect engagement and activities that we have with our partners must be aligned and support our climate ambition” and confirming a “public commitment…to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement.” Oversight is linked to formal structures, as “People leading the work, of the external trade associations on Safety & Environment, are both included into Cargotec Sustainability Board or the Sustainability Innovation Team,” indicating that these internal bodies can review and influence external advocacy. The company also discloses that its trade-association memberships are listed in the GRI index, hinting at some transparency. However, it does not disclose a structured monitoring or audit process, the frequency or criteria by which the Sustainability Board assesses alignment, nor any examples of engaging, correcting, or exiting associations whose positions diverge from its climate objectives. No dedicated lobbying-alignment report or board-level sign-off on a lobbying plan is described. Consequently, while a policy and oversight mechanism are referenced, the disclosure lacks the depth and detail that would demonstrate a systematic, comprehensive approach to governing both direct and indirect climate lobbying activities.
|
2
|