Arca Continental SAB de CV

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None Arca Continental SAB de CV provides virtually no transparency around its climate-related lobbying activities, offering only references to its membership in industry associations without any further detail. The company mentions its participation in ANPRAC, ASCOCA, CONCAMIN, and its founding partnership in ECOCE, but does not identify any specific climate policies, laws, or regulations it has sought to influence. It similarly omits details on how it engages these groups – for example, it does not describe meetings, submissions, or other lobbying mechanisms, nor does it name any policymakers or governmental bodies as targets of its engagement. Finally, Arca Continental does not set out any desired policy outcomes or explain what legislative changes it supports or opposes. Overall, the disclosure does not provide any substantive information about the company’s climate-policy lobbying activities. 0
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Arca Continental SAB de CV describes an “Ethics and Compliance Steering Committee” led by its Chief Executive Officer and senior management that “reports the status of the system to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,” and notes that in each territory a Local Ethics and Compliance Committee resolves infractions and executes action plans, but the company does not disclose any processes specifically for governing direct or indirect lobbying activities. The company states that “as part of the structure of the climate change strategy, AC establishes alliances and leads joint projects” and that it “actively participates in close to 100 associations and organizations to promote sustainable development,” yet provides no detail on how these indirect engagements are aligned or reviewed against its climate commitments. Although it confirms a “public commitment or position statement to conduct [its] engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” there is no named individual or committee responsible for lobbying oversight, nor any monitoring or sign-off procedure described for its policy advocacy. 1