Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Strong | Amcor provides a largely transparent picture of its climate-related lobbying. It names several identifiable pieces of legislation it has worked on, including the “UK Resources Waste Strategy Proposals regarding potential legislation for beverage deposits, extended producer responsibility, standardized collection, and a tax on plastic packaging made from virgin resin,” the EU “Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR),” and the “United Nations’ Treaty to End Plastic Pollution,” as well as engagement on the EU Circular Economy Package and carbon-pricing discussions. The company also describes multiple routes it uses to influence policy. It “responds to consultation papers directly where appropriate and when they are relevant,” “submitt[ed] responses to the UK Resources Waste Strategy Proposals,” hosted “visits for elected officials” at its plants, and ran “our advocacy campaign … through membership organizations, as well as through direct engagement with governments and institutions” such as EUROPEN and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation; these references name clear mechanisms and identify targets such as the UK Government, EU institutions and the United Nations. On desired outcomes, Amcor states that it seeks to ensure policies are implemented “effectively” to deliver “lasting positive changes for both industry and the environment,” and aims “to facilitate and develop widespread recycling and recovery options for packaging materials through increased spend on recycling infrastructure and collection points, alignment of state grants, and supportive policy with industry grant investment.” Although these ambitions are framed in broad terms rather than precise legislative amendments or numeric targets, they nonetheless articulate more than one concrete policy goal. Taken together, the company demonstrates strong, though not exhaustive, transparency across policy focus, lobbying channels and intended results of its climate-related advocacy. | 3 |