Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate | Cameco provides a moderate level of transparency on its climate-related lobbying. It names two specific pieces of Canadian climate legislation it has engaged on: “The proposed Clean Fuel Standard … under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999” and the “Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases (Standards and Compliance) Regulations, 2023 … Saskatchewan,” and it also refers to broader nuclear-advocacy work through the Net Zero Nuclear initiative. The company is clear about how and where it lobbies: it filed a formal submission to the U.S. Department of Commerce on uranium imports, undertook “direct participation … at engagement webinars on the proposed CFS,” provided “indirect participation … through the Mining Association of Canada and the Saskatchewan Mining Association,” and “engaged with the provincial government in Saskatchewan as the regulations were developed.” However, its disclosure of the specific outcomes it seeks is limited. Beyond stating a “neutral stance on the implementation of the CFS,” a wish to “help the regulator understand the opportunities and challenges faced by our industry,” and broad support for tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050, Cameco does not spell out concrete legislative changes, targets, or amendments it is pursuing on climate policy. As a result, while the company is forthcoming about the policies it addresses and the mechanisms and targets of its lobbying, it offers only general statements about the policy results it is trying to achieve. | 2 |