Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Telix Pharmaceuticals provides only limited visibility into its climate-related (in this case, broader public-policy) lobbying. It names a single piece of legislation—the U.S. FIND Act—and notes that it is “actively involved in supporting policy and legislative measures that encourage innovation and promote access for patients, such as the FIND Act in the U.S.”, but no other policies are identified and the company does not explain which provisions of the bill it sought to influence. The description of how it lobbies remains high-level: it says it works to “lift the profile of theranostics, and partner with governments” and leads “industry collaboration with policymakers,” yet it does not specify concrete mechanisms (such as letters, formal submissions, or meetings) or identify the individual agencies or lawmakers it approaches. The intended outcomes are expressed only in general terms—ensuring “appropriate Medicare reimbursement and equitable access to innovative radiopharmaceutical imaging drugs”—without detailing the precise changes, targets, or timelines the company is advocating. As a result, while Telix acknowledges some engagement, it leaves most of the substantive information about policies, methods, and desired results undisclosed. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None Telix describes its advocacy activities, stating “Telix maintains an active role in supporting policy and legislative measures that foster innovation” and noting it is a “member of Nuclear Medicines Europe” where it “advocate[s] on critical issues relating to EU Pharmaceutical Legislation,” participates with “123 organizations … working collaboratively on the FIND Act in the United States,” and contributes through “written submissions and direct participation in in-person consultations” to the Federal Health Technology Assessment Review. However, the company does not disclose any internal policy, process, or monitoring procedure for overseeing these lobbying efforts, nor does it identify any individual or formal body responsible for ensuring alignment of its advocacy with company goals. We found no evidence of a lobbying governance framework or any mechanism for review, sign-off, or management of its direct or indirect lobbying activities. 0