Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Persimmon’s climate lobbying governance framework is anchored at the Board level, with “ultimate responsibility for all matters related to sustainability including our approach to climate change [resting] with the Board” and regular oversight by a Sustainability Committee chaired by the Chief Executive that “meets on a bi-monthly basis” to discuss climate-related issues and provide updates on policy engagement. The company’s “Climate Change Position Paper outlines our approach to climate change and our stance when engaging with policy makers,” and it explicitly commits to “engage with policy makers to develop appropriate measures for reducing energy use and carbon emissions across the housebuilding sector,” establishing a clear policy foundation. The Board also “receives regular updates from the Chairman and Group Chief Executive regarding direct engagement with Government, Homes England and the Home Builders Federation,” and Persimmon states it “regularly engage[s] and consult[s] with the Home Builders Federation on challenges and solutions surrounding a low carbon transition including the Future Homes Standard,” demonstrating active direct advocacy. The company confirms a public position to conduct its engagement in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. However, while Persimmon discloses memberships of industry bodies and outlines channels for indirect engagement, it does not describe any formal mechanism to assess or align those associations’ positions with its climate policy or to manage potential conflicts, nor does it publish a dedicated climate-lobbying audit or third-party review, so the specific processes for reviewing, monitoring, and enforcing both direct and indirect lobbying alignment are not disclosed.
View Sources
|
C |