Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate |
Hill & Smith PLC provides limited but identifiable disclosure of how it governs climate-related external engagement. The company states that “the group ESG strategy has been communicated to all businesses across the group, with the Company Secretary providing the lead role for implementation and any queries that arise,” indicating a named individual who oversees alignment of engagement with the ESG and climate strategy. It further explains that engagement is “typically with trade associations that are aligned with the types of products we supply,” in response to questions about keeping those activities “consistent with your overall climate change strategy” and “with your climate commitments and/or climate transition plan,” suggesting a procedural intention to check that indirect lobbying through trade bodies does not conflict with its climate approach. In addition, the Board retains explicit authority over political influence decisions, as its matters-reserved list includes “Approval of any political donations of any value,” and the Board “retains the authority to ‘call in’ for decision or review any matter previously or currently delegated,” which signals an escalation and review mechanism. However, the disclosures do not describe how direct lobbying positions are assessed, give no detail on criteria or frequency of trade-association reviews, and do not mention publishing any lobbying-alignment audit or the outcomes of such oversight. Overall, the evidence shows a basic policy with oversight and a named responsible officer, but the monitoring procedures and coverage remain high-level and largely confined to indirect engagement, so the governance appears moderate rather than comprehensive.
View Sources
|
C |