Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate |
Ambu A/S provides limited but explicit disclosure of how it keeps its policy engagement aligned with its climate objectives. It states that “The Sustainability & ESG committee consists of Executive Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents…[and] meets with the Director of ESG once a month” and that “The CEO and CFO approve policies, reporting and selected processes,” indicating that senior management regularly reviews sustainability–related activities, which implicitly includes external engagement. In its responses to questions on engagement it adds that “Our engagement with Danish Industry (DI) focuses on climate-related activities and policies and is aligned with our ambition to contribute to a circular economy” and that this participation helps it “understand the challenges and opportunities within our industry, and participate in the dialogue around how we can further advance the agenda through for instance changes in current legislation.” These statements show the company has a process to assess at least one trade-association relationship for consistency with its climate strategy and a high-level committee that can oversee such alignment, which indicates some governance of indirect lobbying. However, Ambu does not disclose a formal policy or methodology for systematically reviewing all direct lobbying positions or the full suite of industry associations, nor does it publish any dedicated lobbying-alignment report; the evidence therefore does not demonstrate a comprehensive monitoring mechanism, board-level sign-off specific to lobbying, or actions taken when misalignment occurs.
View Sources
|
C |