Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Italgas provides extensive and specific disclosure about its climate-policy lobbying. It names multiple EU files it has worked on, including the “Proposal for a legislative act on methane leakage in the energy sector,” the companion “Regulation on methane emissions reduction in the energy sector and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/942,” the “Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2010/31/EU,” the “Hydrogen and decarbonised gas market package” that reviews Gas Directive 2009/73/EC and Regulation 715/2009, and other measures such as TEN-E and RED II, showing clear identification of the legislation it seeks to influence. The company also describes how it lobbies: it “presented position papers and held discussions with Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and National representatives in the Council,” engaged in “direct contacts with DG ENERGY officers,” took part in a webinar hosted by the Directorate-General ENERGY, uploaded feedback on the Commission’s “Have Your Say” portal, and used industry platforms such as GD4S and Eurogas, thereby detailing several distinct mechanisms and naming the precise EU bodies it targets. Finally, Italgas sets out the concrete outcomes it pursues, advocating for “the recognition of a specific gas DSOs role in the nascent hydrogen market,” “differentiated unbundling rules” for DSOs, the creation of “a specific gas DSO Entity… to contribute to the revision of market codes,” and technical amendments to the methane-leakage proposal, such as aligning monitoring with UNEP’s OGMP 2.0 and adjusting repair frequencies. By coupling clearly identified policy dossiers with explicit lobbying channels and well-defined policy changes it seeks, the company demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying activities. | 4 |