RAI Way SpA

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None RAI Way SpA does not disclose any internal governance mechanisms for its lobbying activities or any process to align policy engagement with its climate strategy. The company describes a structured process for “measuring and reporting on non-financial issues” and stakeholder engagement under the “AA1000-Stakeholder Engagement Standard (SES),” but these processes relate to materiality and sustainability priorities rather than policy advocacy. While Rai Way “is a member of various trade associations and has a seat at the table of international representative bodies,” there is no description of how it manages these memberships or other indirect lobbying channels to ensure consistency with its climate commitments. The company also notes that “it does not make direct and/or indirect contributions to political causes,” and confirms it has no current public position to align its engagement with the Paris Agreement, stating “No, but we plan to have one in the next two years.” The company does not disclose any policy, monitoring procedure, or named individual or committee responsible for overseeing its lobbying activities or aligning them with its climate strategy.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None RAI Way SpA offers virtually no disclosure about climate-related lobbying. Its reporting centres on internal sustainability commitments—such as “actively participates in the UNGC initiative by committing itself on two fronts: by applying the UNGC Ten Principles… and by carrying out projects aimed at achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”—but it does not identify any specific climate laws or regulations it has tried to influence, describe any direct or indirect engagement with policymakers, or explain what legislative or regulatory outcomes it seeks. As a result, there is no evidence of actual lobbying activity, targets, or policy objectives in relation to climate change.

E