Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Iron Mountain states that it “has set climate-related targets and made climate-related commitments which help ensure that our climate change strategy aligns with policy influence activities.” It cites its “Science Based Target commitment and RE100 commitment” and explains that these “frameworks work closely with broader organizations that engage in policy influence related to climate change mitigation, including the World Resources Institute and World Wildlife Fund,” and that its “participation in the Clean Energy Buyers Association aligns with our public renewable energy consumption goals.” However, the company does not disclose any oversight process or how lobbying activities are monitored or managed, does not name any individual or committee responsible for reviewing climate lobbying, and confirms that it has “no” public commitment to conduct engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement and “does not plan to have one in the next two years,” which indicates limited lobbying governance transparency.
View Sources
|
D |