LTIMindtree Ltd

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Sign Up

Direct Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Moderate	LTIMindtree provides a moderate level of transparency on its climate-policy advocacy. It identifies the broad area it works on—“renewable energy mandates,” including tools such as “feed-in tariffs, tax credits, and renewable energy portfolio standards”—and confirms that its activity is focused on India and aligned with the Paris Agreement, but it does not name the specific statutes or regulatory proceedings it has attempted to influence. The company is clearer on how it pursues this agenda, explaining that it “works through various forums” and engages directly with named bodies such as NASSCOM, the United Nations Global Compact, CII, WBCSD, WWF, NITI Aayog and IGBC to channel policy recommendations, and that these efforts are coordinated by a dedicated sustainability team. It also articulates the results it is seeking: accelerating renewable-energy deployment by ensuring “easy grid access, economical tariffs, and infrastructure/installation support” and making solar, hydro and wind policies “more favorable and scalable for easier market penetration.” While these disclosures reveal the basic mechanisms employed and the concrete outcomes it wants, the absence of specific bills or regulatory dockets limits the overall depth of its lobbying transparency.	2

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Comment	Score
Limited	LTIMindtree discloses that it has "a public commitment or position statement to conduct [its] engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement" and indicates that its "CEO and Managing Director is the highest executive authority responsible for implementing and overseeing our ESG, climate action, CSR, and related policies," which suggests top-level oversight might extend to policy engagement; however, the evidence refers only broadly to ESG and CSR oversight and offers no specific description of how lobbying activities are monitored, reviewed, or aligned, nor any mention of procedures for managing trade-association positions or direct advocacy. Apart from the Paris-alignment commitment, we found no disclosure of a formal process, dedicated committee, or recurring review that governs lobbying, and the company does not disclose any mechanism for assessing or correcting misaligned lobbying by itself or by third parties.	1