Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
EnerSys demonstrates robust oversight of its climate policy through its Sustainability (ESG) Program: “The Board of Directors and our CEO administer our Sustainability (ESG) Program, which includes governance over our Climate Policy,” and this is supported by its Enterprise Risk Management effort that “evaluate[s] all risks that have the potential to impact our business, including climate change.” Senior bodies such as the ESG Steering Committee and the Executive Risk Management Committee meet quarterly to oversee “identifying and prioritizing risks, including climate-related risks.” However, we found no evidence of any governance process to manage or align the company’s lobbying or policy engagement activities with its climate strategy, and the company does not disclose oversight, monitoring, or accountability mechanisms for direct or indirect lobbying efforts.
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
EnerSys provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying activities. It indicates that it works through an industry association, the Alliance to Save Energy, and participates in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Better Plants Program, revealing one indirect mechanism but without naming any specific meetings, correspondence or decision-makers it contacts. The company refers generally to “federal energy efficiency policies” and broader goals around energy efficiency and decarbonisation, yet no individual bills, regulations or rulemakings are identified. Likewise, it states broad ambitions—such as reducing its own energy intensity over the next decade—without linking these objectives to concrete legislative or regulatory outcomes it is seeking to influence. As a result, while EnerSys acknowledges some involvement in policy advocacy, the disclosures lack the detail needed to understand the exact policies, lobbying channels, or changes it is pursuing.
|
D
|