Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited |
Suzlon Energy offers only a basic outline of how it manages policy-influence activities. It states that “Principle 7 – Businesses, when engaging in influencing public and regulatory policy, should do so in a manner that is responsible and transparent,” adds that “The Corporate Governance Policy and Suzlon’s Code of Ethics ensures maintaining business responsibility and transparency,” and clarifies that “The Code of Ethics is used for taking actions in influencing public and regulatory policy.” The company also commits that “the Company shall prepare a Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR)… and place before the Board for its approval on an annual basis,” signalling that the Board reviews an annual disclosure that covers lobbying-related matters. More broadly, “Our Board is vested with the responsibility of reviewing our social, environmental, and economic performances,” underscoring high-level oversight. However, the disclosure provides no detail on the specific procedures, metrics, or decision-making criteria used to monitor or align direct or indirect lobbying with climate goals, does not identify an executive owner beyond general Board approval, and makes no reference to reviewing or managing trade-association positions. The absence of concrete monitoring mechanisms or escalation steps indicates that only limited governance around lobbying alignment is publicly documented.
View Sources
|
1 |