Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Chemours provides a highly detailed and open account of its climate-related lobbying. It names multiple specific policies it seeks to shape, including the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, U.S. EPA rule-making under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, the EU revision of the F-Gas Regulation, and the EU REACH proposal to restrict PFAS, as well as its links to the EU Green Deal. The company also lays out the channels it uses and the decision-makers it targets: it describes submitting data in the European Chemicals Agency public consultation, “lobbying in support of the U.S. ratification and implementation of Kigali,” engaging directly with the U.S. EPA on the AIM Act, and working with “the European Parliament” and “the Council of the EU,” thereby clarifying both the mechanisms—public consultations, formal rule-making processes, and direct advocacy—and the governmental bodies involved. Finally, Chemours articulates the precise outcomes it is pursuing: it supports the phasedown of HFCs, seeks “time-unlimited derogations for fluoropolymers,” advocates exemptions for fluoropolymers and certain f-gases from the proposed PFAS ban, and looks for revisions to the F-Gas Regulation that balance environmental and socio-economic goals. By specifying the policies, the advocacy methods, the targets, and the concrete results it hopes to achieve, Chemours demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate policy lobbying. | 4 |