Nomad Foods Ltd

Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
None Nomad Foods Ltd’s disclosures are limited to stating that “We disclose lobbying in line with relevant government regulations on public websites” and providing links to the Ireland lobbying register and the EU Transparency Register. We found no evidence of an internal governance process, as the company does not disclose any oversight structures, monitoring or management procedures, named individual or committee responsible for reviewing its lobbying activities, or policies to align direct or indirect lobbying with its corporate or climate objectives. The information provided focuses solely on regulatory transparency rather than describing any internal mechanisms for ensuring accountability or alignment of lobbying efforts.

View Sources

E
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited Nomad Foods provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company refers to its participation in the Move to -15°C coalition, an initiative that advocates raising frozen-food storage temperatures as a way to cut greenhouse-gas emissions, but it does not identify any specific climate policies, legislation or regulations it has engaged with, nor does it state that this is the sole focus of its lobbying. It also offers no detail on how it seeks to influence decision-makers—there is no mention of meetings, letters, consultations, or the government bodies targeted—so the mechanisms and lobbying targets remain undisclosed. The disclosure does convey a broad objective: encouraging an industry-wide shift to ‑15°C storage temperatures to reduce supply-chain emissions, yet it stops short of outlining any concrete legislative or regulatory changes it wants enacted or explaining the rationale for its policy positions. Overall, the company’s transparency around its climate lobbying activities is minimal, confined to a single initiative and lacking clarity on policy engagement, methods, and desired outcomes.

D