Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Kodiak Gas Services offers only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It discloses that it provided “feedback and insights on emission levels regulation relevant to the State of New Mexico’s 20.2.50 NMAC – Ozone Precursor Pollutants rule making (NMED Methane Rule),” which at least identifies a single, specific regulatory process it engaged with. Beyond noting this feedback, however, the company does not describe how it lobbied—for example, whether it submitted written comments, met with regulators, or worked through industry associations—and it does not name the specific agencies or officials it approached. Most importantly, Kodiak does not explain what it hoped to achieve through its engagement; it gives no indication of whether it supported, opposed, or sought amendments to the methane rule or what environmental or commercial outcomes it was pursuing. As a result, while the company confirms that it has been involved in one identifiable climate-related rule-making, its disclosures leave the mechanism, targets, and desired policy outcomes largely unexplained.
|
D |