Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico discloses only a basic commitment to keep its external engagements consistent with its climate objectives, stating that "we adhere to alliances and associations that seek to promote climate action, especially those aligned with the Paris Agreements." This indicates an intention to align indirect lobbying through association memberships with the company’s climate commitments, which suggests some awareness of the need for consistency. However, the disclosure does not explain how this alignment is assessed or enforced, provides no description of a formal monitoring or review procedure, and does not identify any individual or governance body responsible for oversight. There is also no reference to how the company manages its own direct advocacy activities. As a result, the available information points to only a limited governance approach, with a high-level policy statement but no transparent mechanisms, processes, or accountability structures publicly documented. View Sources	D

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Limited

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico discloses only a basic commitment to keep its external engagements consistent with its climate objectives, stating that "we adhere to alliances and associations that seek to promote climate action, especially those aligned with the Paris Agreements." This indicates an intention to align indirect lobbying through association memberships with the company’s climate commitments, which suggests some awareness of the need for consistency. However, the disclosure does not explain how this alignment is assessed or enforced, provides no description of a formal monitoring or review procedure, and does not identify any individual or governance body responsible for oversight. There is also no reference to how the company manages its own direct advocacy activities. As a result, the available information points to only a limited governance approach, with a high-level policy statement but no transparent mechanisms, processes, or accountability structures publicly documented.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	No evidence found	E