MEIJI Holdings Co Ltd

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Limited Meiji Holdings offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The company signals a general alignment with international and domestic policy frameworks—referencing the Paris Agreement and Japanese legislation such as the Act on the Rational Use of Energy and the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures—but it does not clarify whether or how it has tried to influence these measures. Indirect mechanisms are mentioned in passing: Meiji notes its participation in the Japan Food Industry Center’s Sustainability Committee, which “submits policy proposals to the government,” and attendance at seminars run by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Ministry of the Environment, yet it gives no detail on meetings, written submissions, or other concrete channels of advocacy, nor does it name specific officials or legislative processes that were approached. Likewise, the company does not set out the policy changes it hopes to secure; its disclosures focus instead on operational initiatives such as “conducting farm mapping,” “training farmers regarding the latest Good Agricultural Practices,” and achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, without linking these ambitions to particular legislative outcomes. The absence of clearly identified policies, mechanisms, and desired legislative results leaves stakeholders with only a partial picture of Meiji’s climate-policy lobbying activity. 1
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Moderate MEIJI Holdings discloses a moderate governance framework for its climate-related lobbying activities, focusing on its indirect engagement through industry associations. It highlights that “The Meiji Group is a member of the Japan Food Industry Center and actively participates in its Sustainability Committee” and that it “regularly check[s] our climate change strategies and the activities of the organizations we affiliate to ensure alignment between them,” with discrepancies “discussed and resolved in the Group Environmental Conference, which is linked to the Group Sustainability Committee chaired by our CEO.” This indicates that a formal body chaired by the CEO oversees alignment between its climate policies and the positions of affiliated organizations. However, the company does not disclose any specific processes or oversight mechanisms for its direct lobbying activities, and its participation in seminars is described as an information-gathering exercise rather than a structured lobbying review. We found no evidence of board-level sign-off or a dedicated policy governing direct advocacy toward policymakers. 2