Orion Oyj – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Moderate	Orion Oyj discloses that "Orion's CEO is a member of the board in the industry association, The Chemical Industry Federation of Finland, and Head of Corporate Responsibility is in the federation's Sustainability Committee" and states that "by active participation we have opportunities to influence and ensure that our engagement activities are consistent with our overall climate change strategy." This identifies named senior executives who oversee and participate in an external body, providing a concrete—though limited—mechanism to align indirect lobbying with the company’s climate strategy, indicating moderate governance. Nevertheless, the company also acknowledges that it has "No" public commitment to conduct engagement "in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement," and we found no evidence of a broader, systematic process covering direct lobbying, no description of formal monitoring, auditing, or reporting, and no criteria for assessing or potentially correcting misaligned association positions, so the depth and transparency of its lobbying-governance framework remain constrained. View Sources	C

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Moderate

Orion Oyj discloses that "Orion's CEO is a member of the board in the industry association, The Chemical Industry Federation of Finland, and Head of Corporate Responsibility is in the federation's Sustainability Committee" and states that "by active participation we have opportunities to influence and ensure that our engagement activities are consistent with our overall climate change strategy." This identifies named senior executives who oversee and participate in an external body, providing a concrete—though limited—mechanism to align indirect lobbying with the company’s climate strategy, indicating moderate governance. Nevertheless, the company also acknowledges that it has "No" public commitment to conduct engagement "in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement," and we found no evidence of a broader, systematic process covering direct lobbying, no description of formal monitoring, auditing, or reporting, and no criteria for assessing or potentially correcting misaligned association positions, so the depth and transparency of its lobbying-governance framework remain constrained.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	No evidence found	E