Climate Lobbying Index

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Siltronic AG provides only high-level references to keeping its policy engagement aligned with its climate strategy, stating that "Engagement activities related to our Climate strategy are embedded in our Corporate Governance, Risk management, Business strategy and Metrics and Targets" and that such engagement "is in accordance to our Climate Strategy (Metrics and Targets), Corporate Governance and Risk Management." It also confirms a "public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." While these statements indicate an intention to align lobbying and other external engagement with climate objectives, the company does not disclose the concrete governance mechanics behind this intention: there is no description of specific monitoring procedures, no evidence that direct or trade-association lobbying is reviewed for consistency with climate goals, and no identification of a board committee, executive, or other body responsible for overseeing lobbying alignment. In the absence of these details, the disclosure suggests only a limited governance approach rather than a structured process. View Sources	1

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

Limited

Siltronic AG provides only high-level references to keeping its policy engagement aligned with its climate strategy, stating that "Engagement activities related to our Climate strategy are embedded in our Corporate Governance, Risk management, Business strategy and Metrics and Targets" and that such engagement "is in accordance to our Climate Strategy (Metrics and Targets), Corporate Governance and Risk Management." It also confirms a "public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement." While these statements indicate an intention to align lobbying and other external engagement with climate objectives, the company does not disclose the concrete governance mechanics behind this intention: there is no description of specific monitoring procedures, no evidence that direct or trade-association lobbying is reviewed for consistency with climate goals, and no identification of a board committee, executive, or other body responsible for overseeing lobbying alignment. In the absence of these details, the disclosure suggests only a limited governance approach rather than a structured process.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	Siltronic AG offers only limited visibility into its climate-related lobbying. The company notes that it is "in continuous dialog with decision-makers in Singapore" to secure greater renewable-energy availability, showing that it uses direct meetings as a lobbying channel, but it does not identify which ministries, regulators or elected officials are involved. It likewise refers broadly to engaging on renewable-energy issues in Singapore without naming a specific law, regulation or policy instrument under discussion. The objective it describes—ensuring renewable energy supplies "improve by 2030 and beyond" so it can meet its own climate targets—remains an overarching aspiration rather than a clearly articulated legislative or regulatory outcome. As a result, the disclosures reveal only the most general contours of the company’s climate-policy engagement and leave the concrete policies, counterparts and desired policy changes unexplained.	1

Siltronic AG

Lobbying Transparency and Governance