Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
Nova Ljubljanska Banka dd does not disclose any governance process for lobbying activities. Its disclosures centre on sustainability oversight, noting that “NLB Group has put in place a 4-level sustainability governance” and that “a dedicated body entitled the Climate Change Committee (CCC) will be formed” to guide its net-zero strategy, but we found no evidence of any policies, procedures, or designated individuals overseeing or reviewing its lobbying efforts or ensuring alignment between its political advocacy and climate objectives.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Nova Ljubljanska Banka’s disclosures provide only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The bank says it “engages with public policy developments” in Slovenia and the wider region and wants government incentives for renewable energy production and a coal phase-out, showing that it is active in broad policy areas such as housing, transport and power generation. However, it does not name any specific laws, regulations or official proposals it has sought to influence, nor does it explain whether these broad themes are the only climate policies it engages on. The description of its approach is equally high-level: it refers generically to working with “governments and institutions” but gives no detail on the actual channels used—such as meetings, written submissions or participation in consultations—or on the particular ministries, agencies or legislative bodies it targets. Finally, while the bank indicates a general aim of supporting decarbonisation and a shift to renewable electricity, it does not spell out concrete legislative changes, measurable targets or amendments it is advocating. As a result, the disclosures reveal only that the bank supports climate action in principle; they do not provide the specificity needed to understand its lobbying activities, methods or desired policy outcomes.
|
D
|