Direct Lobbying Transparency
| Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Strong | ICL Group provides a clear picture of its climate-policy engagement. It explicitly names the two Israeli initiatives it has worked on—the “Israeli voluntary GHG reporting mechanism” and the “Israeli PRTR reporting mechanism”—and describes how its input related to each, demonstrating solid transparency about the policies it lobbies. The company also describes how it lobbies, noting participation in “round table forums regarding the PRTR law” and submitting “experience-based opinions on the best way of implementing mandatory GHG reporting,” and it identifies its main interlocutor as the Israeli Ministry for the Protection of the Environment, so both the methods and the policymaking target are spelled out. Finally, it is explicit about what it wants to achieve: unifying “reporting methodologies and boundaries of GHG emissions,” reducing the reporting burden and confusion for stakeholders, supporting mandatory GHG reporting, and encouraging broader corporate participation to help meet national mitigation goals. Taken together, these disclosures show a strong level of transparency across all three dimensions—policies, mechanisms, and desired outcomes—though the company focuses on a limited set of domestic reporting policies. | 3 |