Direct Lobbying Transparency
| Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited | Bank Mandiri offers only limited visibility into its climate-policy lobbying. It does name one concrete initiative it has engaged on, the “Indonesia Green Taxonomy,” and notes that this framework covers “919 sub-sectors, groups, and business activities,” so readers can clearly identify the relevant policy. The bank also outlines several ways it presses its views—“quarterly feedback to regulators, written feedbacks or through FGDs”—and specifies that these efforts are directed at Indonesian “regulators,” providing at least some detail on both the mechanisms used and the policymaking audience. However, it does not cite any other climate policies beyond the taxonomy, nor does it clarify whether this is the full extent of its lobbying. In addition, while the bank says its engagement is “aligned with the Paris Agreement” and that it is “piloting the Indonesia Green Taxonomy,” it gives no concrete legislative or regulatory changes it hopes to secure and even lists its position on the policy as “Undecided.” The absence of clearly stated policy outcomes and the narrow scope of policies disclosed leave significant gaps in understanding the breadth and intent of the company’s climate-related lobbying. | 1 |