Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
Sigma Lithium offers only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. The company says it has been "actively engaged in the critical dialogues on the decarbonization of global industrial and mineral supply chains" and refers to supporting "Brazil’s initiatives to leverage its natural resources," but it does not identify any specific laws, regulations or formal policy proposals it has tried to influence, leaving readers unclear about the exact measures under discussion. Its description of methods is equally high-level: it claims to be "consistently engaging directly with world leaders in bilateral meetings and closed discussions," which confirms that meetings are used as a lobbying mechanism, yet it names no individual officials, agencies or jurisdictions. Finally, the objectives of these engagements are framed only in broad terms such as a desire to "promote a just energy transition" and to advance "ecosystem preservation and social justice," without stating the concrete legislative or regulatory outcomes the company is advocating. Taken together, the disclosure signals that the company is participating in climate-policy conversations but provides very little concrete information about the policies, targets, or results it seeks.
|
D |