Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
None
|
LONGi has marked "climate actions as an important development strategy of the Company" and "formed a governance structure, under the supervision and guidance of the Board" with the Sustainable Development Committee "formulat(ing) action guidelines" and Brand Management implementing actions to manage climate risks; however, we found no evidence of any lobbying governance process—the company does not disclose how it oversees or manages direct or indirect lobbying activities, nor does it name a responsible individual or committee for ensuring alignment of lobbying with its climate goals.
View Sources
|
E
|
Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
Limited
|
LONGi discloses only broad, thematic information about its climate-related advocacy. It says it participates in forums such as the UN Global Compact CEO Roundtable, the “Energy Low-carbon Transformation Forum,” the “China-Europe CEO Dialogue,” and works with the Global Solar Council to share “reports, policy papers and workshops,” but it does not reveal whether these activities involved letters, formal consultations, or direct meetings with identifiable policymakers. The company calls for “long-term and stable policy support, subsidies and incentives” for the photovoltaic sector and aims to “advocate for policies that empower the solar industry and contribute to a greener, more resilient planet,” yet it does not name any specific laws, regulations, or jurisdictions it has engaged on, nor does it set out measurable legislative changes it seeks. Consequently, although it signals an intention to influence policy, the absence of concrete detail on the policies, lobbying channels, targets, or precise outcomes sought means LONGi’s transparency around its climate lobbying is limited.
|
D
|