JM AB

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited JM AB discloses some information about its engagement activities and alignment with climate commitments, but the evidence does not provide a clear governance framework for lobbying. The company mentions its active participation in the Haga Initiative, stating that it is "on the board/the steering committee" and engages in "ongoing dialogue at the initiative and with the members to make sure that the activities are aligned with JM's vision and strategy." However, this does not explicitly describe internal mechanisms, oversight structures, or monitoring processes for lobbying governance. JM also highlights its commitment to Fossil Free Sweden's roadmap for the construction sector and its alignment with climate targets, but there is no evidence of a defined process to ensure lobbying alignment or a named individual or committee overseeing these activities. While JM emphasizes the importance of involving the value chain and requiring suppliers to meet similar targets, this pertains more to operational climate goals than to lobbying governance. Additionally, the company states it has a public commitment to align engagement activities with the Paris Agreement, but this does not detail how lobbying activities are governed or monitored. Overall, JM AB does not disclose a robust governance process for lobbying, particularly in relation to climate-related lobbying.

View Sources

1
Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Analysis Score
Limited JM AB provides only limited insight into its climate-policy lobbying. It indicates that it has engaged on “the climate laws and the laws related to climate concerning buildings and the buildings sector,” which signals a general policy area but stops short of naming any specific bills or regulations, so readers cannot determine exactly which measures the company tries to influence. The company explains that its involvement occurs through “different networks and meetings together with other companies that would like to make a positive footprint,” revealing an indirect mechanism but leaving the policymaking targets—such as ministries, regulators, or legislators—unstated. On objectives, JM AB simply says it offers “support with no exceptions” for the climate-related targets of these laws and affirms alignment with the Paris Agreement; it does not spell out any concrete amendments, thresholds, or timelines it advocates. This high-level narrative shows that the company is active in broad climate-mitigation discussions for the building sector, but the absence of named policies, identified lobbying targets, and detailed policy outcomes limits overall transparency.

1