Lobbying Governance
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| None |
No evidence found
View Sources
|
E |
| Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Limited |
YETI offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It indicates that it works through partners such as the Access Fund, the James Beard Foundation and Captains for Clean Water to influence conservation-focused legislation, and notes that one campaign “resulted in over 43,000 petition signatures and more than 150,000 emails and 1,400 calls to legislators” opposing a Florida bill. While this reveals that public-mobilisation tactics were used, the company does not clarify whether it itself wrote letters, held meetings, or submitted testimony, nor does it identify the specific government bodies or individual policymakers that were approached. The disclosure likewise refers only generically to “local legislation that would threaten restoration and conservation efforts” without naming the bill or any other concrete climate or environmental measures. Finally, the objectives of its advocacy remain broad—such as “protect[ing] Florida’s estuaries” or “advancing conservation and preservation efforts”—with no explanation of the precise policy changes or quantitative targets it is seeking. Overall, the company acknowledges that it is active on policy, but the absence of named policies, clear lobbying channels, and explicit outcomes keeps the level of transparency low.
|
D |