Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment | Analysis | Score |
---|---|---|
Moderate |
Mobico Group PLC’s disclosures reveal a mechanism to align its direct policy engagement with its climate strategy, but its overall lobbying governance framework remains limited and lacks clarity around monitoring and oversight. Notably, the company insists that “dialogue with local and national politicians and other interested stakeholders is conducted by representatives of the company that are familiar with its climate change strategy at Divisional and Group level,” which provides a concrete process for ensuring engagement consistency. The company further details its successful direct advocacy, reporting that its “partnership approach model in our UK Bus business helped to shape the National Bus Strategy’s Bus Service Improvement Plan model (BSIP),” and that “we also worked closely with TfWM and the Mayor to secure Coventry as the first electric bus city in the UK,” underscoring its capacity for direct lobbying. Despite this, we found no evidence of a formal review or sign-off process specifically for lobbying activities, nor does the company identify any individual or committee charged explicitly with overseeing lobbying alignment. The mention of a “new Global Sustainability Steering Group (GSSG), which was incorporated during the year and has the Group CFO and the Group Human Resources and Communications Director as the Executive sponsors,” suggests broader sustainability governance, but its remit regarding lobbying is unclear. The company’s admission that it does not have “a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement” further highlights the absence of a comprehensive climate lobbying governance framework.
View Sources
|
C |