Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Comprehensive |
Galp Energia SGPS SA discloses extensive detail on its climate-policy lobbying. It clearly names the climate measures it engages with, including the Fit-For-55 package, the revision of the EU-ETS, RED II, FuelEU, and RefuelEU. It also explains how it engages, stating that it “participates actively in public consultations and in collaborative groups, conferences and forums created by the European Commission” and “promote[s] meetings with the European institutions,” targeting bodies such as DGEG, APA, the National Portuguese Government, and the European Commission. The company is equally explicit about the outcomes it seeks, proposing “improvements on some topics covered in this legislation, namely the protection to the raw materials extracted within EU territories,” backing the revised RED targets, and advocating “revisions to the EU-ETS and other Fit-For-55 package elements,” while emphasizing the role of governments, industry, and society in a holistic decarbonisation approach. These disclosures demonstrate a high level of transparency across its climate lobbying activities.
|
4
|
| Overall Assessment |
Comment |
Score |
| Moderate |
Galp Energia SGPS SA has implemented a clear process for governing its indirect lobbying by trade associations, noting that “we regularly engage with trade associations to ensure alignment with key climate agreements and principles” and that “as part of our engagement with several trade associations, Galp publishes, annually, a report on the alignment of the main associations in which we are present with the Paris Agreement, the European Climate Law and Galp’s purpose, vision, mission and values.” The company further explains that “all our associations are analyzed according with these criteria and the monitoring report is annually updated and publicly available,” which shows active alignment measures for association memberships. However, the company does not disclose any dedicated governance mechanism for its direct lobbying activities, nor does it name a specific individual or formal body responsible for overseeing lobbying alignment, and we found no evidence of a structured review or board-level sign-off process for its climate-related policy engagement.
|
2
|