Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc

Lobbying Transparency and Governance

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment Comment Score
Strong Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings provides a reasonably detailed picture of its climate-related lobbying. It identifies two concrete public-policy agendas it has tried to influence, namely Japan’s Sixth Strategic Energy Plan and the creation of a national carbon-pricing system, and explains its involvement in multilateral efforts such as the Investors Policy Dialogue on Deforestation that seek tighter land-use rules in Brazil and Indonesia. The company is most explicit about how it lobbies: it describes direct dialogue with Japanese policymakers on the future power-generation mix, letters and meetings with Brazil’s government (including the Central Bank Governor and Ambassador to Japan), and participation in collaborative platforms such as the IPDD and the Net Zero Banking Alliance, together revealing multiple clear mechanisms and the specific governmental targets of those actions. It also states the outcomes it pursues, such as stricter anti-deforestation regulation in Brazil and Indonesia and adoption of carbon pricing in Japan, going beyond broad net-zero aspirations to set out the policy changes it supports. While the disclosures do not yet catalogue every individual climate policy the group addresses, they nevertheless offer strong transparency across the policies, methods and objectives of its lobbying activities. 3
Lobbying Governance
Overall Assessment Comment Score
None Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc’s disclosures focus heavily on its internal climate-change governance but do not include any mechanisms to ensure that its external engagement or lobbying activities are aligned with its climate commitments. For example, it describes “a governance system of supervision and execution centering on the Board of Directors” and details advisory bodies such as its “Risk Committee” and “Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Project Team” that oversee and execute climate-related strategies. However, we found no evidence of any process to review or monitor its direct or indirect lobbying alignment with its climate policies, and the company does not disclose any individual or committee responsible for overseeing policy advocacy or managing trade association engagement. 0