Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
None
|
King Yuan Electronics Co Ltd’s disclosures focus exclusively on its sustainability and supply-chain governance — for example, it states that “本公司設立「永續發展委員會」” and that its “報告書編製小組” is responsible for preparing and reviewing the annual sustainability report — but we found no evidence of any governance process for lobbying activities, whether direct or indirect. There is no description of policies, procedures, or audits to align lobbying with the company’s climate or policy positions, nor is there any named individual or committee overseeing or reviewing lobbying. The only reference to policy engagement is that “No, but we plan to have one in the next two years” regarding a public commitment aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement, but it does not pertain to lobbying governance. We found no evidence of any mechanisms, oversight structures, or accountability measures for climate-related lobbying.
View Sources
|
E
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
King Yuan Electronics provides only limited visibility into its climate-related lobbying. It notes participation in a government-run “溫室氣體盤查相關政策說明會” (greenhouse-gas inventory policy briefing), which indicates a direct engagement mechanism, but it does not name the specific ministry, agency, or officials addressed, leaving the lobbying target unclear. The company identifies the subject matter as a greenhouse-gas inventory policy in Taiwan, thereby signalling involvement in a defined climate-mitigation policy area, yet it stops short of naming the exact regulation or bill. On its policy stance, it simply records that it “support[s] with no exceptions” and intends to ensure the policy’s relevance to its business, without detailing any concrete amendments, targets, or other outcomes it is seeking. Together, these disclosures show the company admits to some policy engagement but offers sparse information on the precise policy, the audiences lobbied, or the specific results it hopes to influence.
|
D
|