KBR Inc – Lobbying Governance & Transparency

Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:

Lobbying Governance

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
None	KBR describes its internal climate governance through a “Net Zero Project Team comprised of a global, multi-department members who work together to endeavour to achieve Net Zero emissions targets in a way that complies with the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) and enhances KBR’s response to climate change,” but the company does not disclose any governance process specific to its direct or indirect lobbying activities or how it aligns its policy advocacy with its climate strategy. There is no evidence of an internal lobbying review or monitoring procedure, no reference to oversight by a named individual or committee, and no description of how the company ensures that its participation in trade or industry associations is consistent with its climate goals. View Sources	E

Overall Assessment

Analysis

Score

None

KBR describes its internal climate governance through a “Net Zero Project Team comprised of a global, multi-department members who work together to endeavour to achieve Net Zero emissions targets in a way that complies with the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) and enhances KBR’s response to climate change,” but the company does not disclose any governance process specific to its direct or indirect lobbying activities or how it aligns its policy advocacy with its climate strategy. There is no evidence of an internal lobbying review or monitoring procedure, no reference to oversight by a named individual or committee, and no description of how the company ensures that its participation in trade or industry associations is consistent with its climate goals.

View Sources

Lobbying Transparency

Overall Assessment	Analysis	Score
Limited	KBR Inc provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. The disclosures indicate involvement in policy-adjacent projects—the company helped CSIRO develop a CO2 Utilisation Roadmap, supported the UK Ministry of Defence in meeting the Net-Zero 2050 initiative, and collaborated with Singapore’s Prime Minister’s Office on hydrogen import options—yet they do not clearly state that KBR actively lobbied on any named piece of legislation or regulation. Policymaking counterparts are mentioned in broad terms, but the company does not explain what methods it used to influence them; no letters, meetings, or consultation submissions are described. Similarly, KBR outlines broad ambitions such as enabling new low-carbon industries and assisting government clients to cut emissions, but it does not spell out the specific policy changes, targets, or amendments it is advocating. As a result, readers are left with only a general sense that the company works alongside government bodies on climate matters, without sufficient detail to understand the precise policies, mechanisms, or outcomes it seeks to influence.	D