Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Comprehensive | CPFL Energia provides a highly detailed picture of its climate-policy advocacy. It names multiple concrete initiatives it works on, including federal bills “PL 232/2016” and “PL 1917/2015” to remodel Brazil’s power sector, the public-consultation for the “Brazilian Carbon Market,” support for the “Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD)” recommendations, the state-level “São Paulo Agreement,” and the wider push for a national carbon tax and cap-and-trade scheme. The company also explains how it tries to influence these measures. It reports participating in public consultations, joining simulations run by FGVces, sitting on the “PMR Advisory Council” and “PMR working group,” and, as it puts it, “actively participat[ing] in the discussions with the Energy Research Company (EPE), the Ministry of Finance, FMBC, among others, with the PMR (World Bank).” These references identify both the engagement tools and the specific government or multilateral bodies targeted. CPFL is equally explicit about what it wants to achieve: it seeks the “formal acceptance” of the TCFD recommendations by G20 nations, backs “the creation of a cap and trade scheme in Brazil” to price carbon cost-effectively, supports rules that would “increase the competitiveness of renewable power generation” and give consumers granular consumption data, and uses the São Paulo Agreement to drive voluntary emissions cuts consistent with keeping warming below 2 °C. By clearly naming the policies, describing the mechanisms and targets of engagement, and spelling out the concrete legislative or regulatory outcomes it is advocating, the company demonstrates a comprehensive level of transparency around its climate-related lobbying activities. | 4 |