Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Sega Sammy Holdings Inc highlights a “public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement,” indicating an intention to align its lobbying and stakeholder engagement with climate targets. However, we found no evidence of any formal governance process—such as a named individual or oversight body, documented monitoring or review procedures, or mechanisms for managing direct or indirect lobbying activities—to ensure that this commitment is translated into practice. The company does not disclose how it oversees compliance with its Paris-aligned engagement policy or whether it engages with trade associations to align their positions, signaling limited transparency around actual lobbying governance.
View Sources
|
1
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Sega Sammy Holdings offers a limited but concrete picture of its climate-related lobbying. It identifies one specific policy engagement—the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards Exposure Draft issued in July 2022—and explains that its comments focused on aspects such as value-chain emissions and the alignment of financial reporting periods. The company also outlines how it lobbied: it participated in the TCFD Consortium and took part in round-table discussions whose outputs were consolidated and submitted through the consortium to the IFRS standard-setter, clearly naming the IFRS Foundation as the policymaking target. While these disclosures reveal at least two distinct mechanisms (consortium membership and structured discussions) and a defined target, the company does not name any additional policies beyond the IFRS draft. Furthermore, it states only broad support for the draft and for alignment with the Paris Agreement, without spelling out the precise legislative amendments or measurable outcomes it seeks. As a result, the transparency around policy coverage and desired outcomes remains fairly general, even though the description of engagement channels is reasonably detailed.
|
1
|