Sign up to access all our data and the evidence and analysis underlying our overall scores. Once you've created an account, we'll get in touch with further details:
Sign Up
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Senior PLC provides only limited insight into how it governs lobbying or wider policy-engagement activities. The company states that it has "a public commitment … to conduct [its] engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement" and explains that it "engage[s] actively with SBTi and CDP in matters relating to climate change," including CEO-level meetings "to ensure Senior continue to concentrate efforts in the most relevant areas of climate change and that we remain well prepared for future developments." While this demonstrates a declared intention to align engagement with Paris-aligned climate objectives, the disclosure does not specify any formal oversight body, individual accountability, or systematic process for reviewing or managing direct or indirect lobbying positions, nor does it reference how trade-association advocacy is monitored or corrected. Consequently, the evidence indicates only an initial policy commitment without the detailed structures, monitoring mechanisms, or oversight expected of a more robust lobbying-governance framework.
View Sources
|
1
|
| Overall Assessment |
Analysis |
Score |
|
Limited
|
Senior PLC offers only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It does name a specific policy focus—the “UK Target to meet Net Zero by 2050”—and explains that its engagement occurred through participation in “an Independent Review of Net Zero commissioned by the UK.” The company also clarifies the mechanism and target of that engagement, noting its attendance at “round table events with limited attendance from key industry sectors” led by “former Energy Minister the Rt Hon Chris Skidmore MP,” thereby identifying both the method and the UK governmental audience. However, this is the sole example provided; no other climate policies, jurisdictions, or lobbying channels are disclosed. On outcomes, the company simply states its “position on the policy: Support with no exceptions” and references alignment with the Paris Agreement, but it does not spell out any concrete amendments, targets, or policy changes it sought through the review process. As a result, while the disclosure confirms that some direct engagement took place and identifies one policy and one mechanism, the overall transparency remains limited.
|
1
|