Direct Lobbying Transparency
Overall Assessment | Comment | Score |
---|---|---|
Limited | Ansell Ltd provides only limited insight into its climate-related lobbying. It names one concrete engagement – participation in USAID’s Sri Lanka Energy Program to help establish “an electricity marketplace” that would expand industrial access to renewable power – but does not list any other climate laws or regulations it has attempted to influence. Beyond a general commitment to “Engage with and support…policy changes which will support the achievement of Ansell’s environmental sustainability goals and commitments,” no further policies are identified. The description of mechanisms is similarly sparse: the company notes that an employee “lobbies internationally as Chair of the Belgian PPE federation called Febelsafe and President of the European Safety Federation,” and that it has “partnered for policy advocacy,” yet only the Sri Lankan initiative clearly links a method (direct engagement through the USAID programme) with a definable government target (Sri Lankan policymakers). On intended outcomes, Ansell explains that its Sri Lankan lobbying seeks to create a renewable-energy marketplace, but for other jurisdictions it offers only broad aspirations such as achieving its “science-based Net Zero by 2040” goal without specifying what legislative or regulatory changes it wishes to see. Overall, the disclosures reveal some activity but lack the detail needed to demonstrate a transparent, systematic approach to climate-policy lobbying. | 1 |